Economic Develoment Subcommitte
Meeting 1: Tuesday, April 20
(6-8 pm)


Summary of Discussion

 

After viewing the presentation, subcommittee members responded with the following general questions and comments regarding information needs, next steps and the group’s potential contributions the study. Some of the group’s personal thoughts and ideas were also included. For the benefit of those not attending the meeting, I have tried to differentiate the general discussion points and comments from the questions. If we are unable to answer a specific question, we will search for the answer and provide the additional information.

Questions from participants –

  • Can we get a copy of the environmental constraints map – (staff will bring to next meeting)
  • What is the history of this project? How long was the South Knoxville bridge on the ‘drawing board’
  • Has TDOT reassessed the need for the JWP extension?
  • If is it completed., will it be on a least-cost basis?
  • Is it mandated to be completed? If so, is it mandated as a four-lane road?
  • The ‘increased access’ (like Middlebrook Pike: at-grade intersections with signals, driveways, etc) alternative for JWP – where did that come from? (This was a TPO executive board request during the tenure of Mayor Ashe)
  • Asked if we had population forecasts/projections for south Knoxville (we currently do not have recent forecasts, other than for Knox County as a whole. We will be breaking these estimates down to smaller sectors at some point but the smaller the area, the less accurate the forecast.
  • Question about traffic counts (all are listed on MPC/TPO web site link)

Process Related Questions, raised by Ron Emery, Subcommittee Chair

Need to figure out what the product is and what the expectations are – how do we approach the assignment? From an Economic Development Standpoint, what are the Pro’s and Con’s of each transportation alternative. Are we all on the same page? What are the appropriate topics to discuss?

Things to examine -

  • How will traffic patterns change
  • How will roadway design impact businesses
  • What is the economic impact of the proposed extension – some businesses are drive-by dependant vs. some that are more independent destinations
  • Can we determine through-traffic (regional bypass traffic) vs. local traffic on Chapman Highway
  • What markets may open up as a result of each alternative

Brainstorming, Issue identification and Comments –

  • Best use of land (zoning, etc) depends on location - sub-areas of Chapman Highway.
  • Discussed recent plans that have economic development component – Bearden Village Opportunity Plan (MPC, TPO and City of Knoxville worked with local businesses to create vision for pedestrian friendly retail and mixed use village).
  • Want more Chapman Highway decisions to be in the best interest of the community
  • Want to improve the business opportunities on Chapman – S. Knoxville is considered to be a difficult place to have a business, because of the isolated area and stigma – want to change this perception. Slowing cleaning up the image.
  • Participant shares a vision to see JWP finished and connected to Chapman, taking through traffic away, letting Chapman be more walkable and pedestrian friendly. JWP has a parkway style approach toward mountains with limited commercial growth and no billboards.
  • Do the businesses need that through traffic to survive? Or is another alternative route needed?
  • Complaints that ‘Seymour residents are flying through’ - design speeds and their impact on public safety will effect Chapman Highway.
  • Participant notes that Magnolia Avenue is near the interstate but is not a thriving business area. James White Parkway extension wouldn’t be as close as I-40 is to Magnolia.
  • Participant thinks change in the character and appearance of the Chapman Corridor is needed.
  • Sidewalks are needed according to some, but another participant questioned why sidewalks were needed in some areas – asked where do pedestrians come from and go?
  • By-pass/through traffic – put it somewhere else to enhance Chapman as the business environment. Use JWP as a way to get from downtown out. Have Chapman designed for slower speed, sidewalks and the community
  • Lack of turn lane in some areas was mentioned (like what they are doing in Bearden), need for divided median is suggested.
  • Some businesses like all the traffic passing by their stores.
  • What is the absorption capacity of South Knoxville? Dave Hill noted that we probably can’t afford to have a market study done as part of this process. May be able to check with retailers who have courtesy cards to find out more about the market area. Census of retail trade data may be helpful
  • Should nice, quiet neighborhoods have to bear the burden of providing mobility for people who don’t pay taxes here, contributing to urban sprawl?
  • Some are interested in seeing if Chapman Highway can be made safer without taking traffic away.

Next Steps -

  • Advertise a general meeting for businesses - plan something such as a survey to find out how businesses feel.
  • Look at arterial roads in other cities - See what options can fit within the existing ROW constraints of Chapman.

Other Comments -

  • Participant suggested that part of making the Chapman Highway area more attractive is better schools, another complimented the fine elementary schools.
  • Unpleasant view of south Knoxville from downtown was mentioned, but S. Knoxville has a unique atmosphere – can be turned into something more positive. Fort Dickerson Park and the need to improve the park
  • Closing Henley St bridge - identify alternatives to total closure. Any change in decision – what is the current proposal? Do they want to add another lane? Tear sides down?
  • This will be a serious impact to businesses. Suggested reversing lanes based on peak flow direction.

 

Meeting summary prepared by Renee Davis, 4-22-04