Results of Evaluation Criteria Worksheet

Safety (157) 3.1

  • Improves vehicular safety. (2.47)
  • Improves pedestrian safety. (2.43)
  • Improves emergency access. (2.39)
  • Improves bike safety. (2.30)

Neighborhood Impacts (144) 2.8

  • Minimizes cut through traffic. (2.21)
  • Minimizes noise. (2.17)
  • Minimizes number of displaced residences. (2.13)
  • Utilizes compatible design characteristics to enhance place-making and aesthetics. (2.09)
  • Promotes neighborhood cohesion. (2.04)

 Business/Economic Impacts (125) 2.5

  • Minimizes number of displaced businesses. (2.22)
  • Is supportive of future population growth. (2.09)
  • Provides ample parking for customers. (1.78)

Environmental Impacts (122-TIE) 2.4

  • Promotes better air quality. (2.35)
  • Protects surface and underground water quality, and minimizes storm water runoff impacts. (2.26)
  • Preserves open space/urban forest. (1.96)
  • Minimizes habitat displacements. (1.83)
  • Minimizes disturbance to wetlands. (1.78)
  • Protects caves. (1.74)

Mobility (122-TIE) 2.4

  • Improves connections within the study area and the rest of the region. (2.22)
  • Increases travel choices. (2.17)

Traffic Congestion (116) 2.3

  • Reduces travel times: fewer delays, level of service improvement. (2.13)

Access (111) 2.2

  • Maintains access to existing businesses. (2.43)
  • Maintains access to residential property. (2.09)
  • Maximizes access by alternative transportation modes. (1.91)
  • Provides access to future development sites. (1.83)

Implementation Feasibility (91) 1.8

  • Maximum cost effectiveness. (2.35)
  • Minimal cost to operate and maintain. (2.04)
  • Least disruptive construction timeframe. (2.04)
  • Minimal total construction cost. (1.69)
  • Quickest construction timeframe. (1.69)

Goods Movement (61) 1.2

  • Minimizes truck impacts on neighborhoods. (2.39)
  • Facilitates truck movements. (1.78)

Equity (51) 1

  • Distributes costs and benefits fairly across the community and region. (1.87)